General Specifications (John Deere E130 lawn tractor)
| Product Name | John Deere E130 |
| Type | lawn tractor |
| Brand | John Deere |
| Weight Lbs | 439 lbs |
| Engine Power Kw | 16 kw |
| Cutting Width Mm | 1067 mm |
| Weight Kg | 199 kg |
| Transport Length M | 1.9 m |
| Transport Length Inches | 73 in |
| Transport Width M | 1.1 m |
| Transport Width Inches | 45 in |
| Power Source | Petrol |
Higher than average John Deere E130 lawn tractor Specs
Lower than average John Deere E130 lawn tractor Specs
Weight Lbs
Lawn tractor weight refers to the weight of a lawn tractor, usually measured in pounds. This measurement helps determine the stability and maneuverability of the tractor on different terrains. A lighter tractor may be easier to navigate, but a heavier one could offer better traction and durability.
The John Deere E130 lawn tractor has very good Weight lbs of 439 (lbs), which is 43 (lbs) more than the average Weight lbs of 396 (lbs). The John Deere E130 lawn tractor is ranked 67 out of 174 lawn tractors for Weight lbs and we have rated it 20% out of 100%, which we consider to be well below average.
Weight Lbs:
Engine Power Kw
Lawn tractor engine power refers to the measurement of energy output by the engine of a lawn tractor, specifically in kilowatts. A higher kW rating suggests greater power and enables the tractor to tackle demanding terrain and heavy-duty work effortlessly.
The John Deere E130 lawn tractor has a Engine power kw of 16 (kw), which is 0 (kw) difference than the average Engine power kw of 16 (kw). The John Deere E130 lawn tractor is ranked 59 out of 174 lawn tractors for Engine power kw and we have rated it 70% out of 100%, which we consider to be poor.
Engine Power Kw:
Cutting Width Mm
The term "cutting width" refers to the measurement, usually in millimeters, of how wide a lawn tractor's cutting deck can trim the grass in one pass. It indicates the amount of area that can be mowed efficiently, helping you determine the time and effort required for mowing your lawn.
The John Deere E130 lawn tractor has a spectacular Cutting Width mm of 1067 (mm), which is 720 (mm) more than the average Cutting Width mm of 347 (mm). The John Deere E130 lawn tractor is ranked 34 out of 174 lawn tractors for Cutting Width mm and we have rated it 70% out of 100%, which we consider to be poor.
Cutting Width Mm:
Transport Length Inches
Lawn tractor transport length inches refers to the measurement of a lawn tractor's length when it is being transported, usually in inches. It helps determine the space required for transportation and storage.
The John Deere E130 lawn tractor has still an excellent Transport length inches of 73 (in), which is 27 (in) more than the average Transport length inches of 46 (in). The John Deere E130 lawn tractor is ranked 53 out of 174 lawn tractors for Transport length inches and we have rated it 54% out of 100%, which we consider to be well below average.
Transport Length Inches:
Transport Width M
The lawn tractor's transport width (m) refers to the measurement of how wide the tractor is when it is being transported. This is essential to know, as it determines whether the tractor can fit through narrow spaces or onto trailers.
The John Deere E130 lawn tractor has super duper transport width m of 1.1 (m), which is 1.1 (m) more than the average transport width m of 0 (m). The John Deere E130 lawn tractor is ranked 28 out of 174 lawn tractors for transport width m and we have rated it 69% out of 100%, which we consider to be poor.
Transport Width M:
Transport Width Inches
The lawn tractor transport width, stated in inches, refers to the measurement of the width of the lawn tractor when it is being transported. This measurement is important for determining whether the lawn tractor can fit through narrow spaces or be easily loaded onto a trailer.
The John Deere E130 lawn tractor has a colossal transport width inches of 45 (in), which is 34 (in) more than the average transport width inches of 11 (in). The John Deere E130 lawn tractor is ranked 27 out of 174 lawn tractors for transport width inches and we have rated it 73% out of 100%, which we consider to be poor.