General Specifications (John Deere X585 lawn tractor)
| Product Name | John Deere X585 |
| Type | lawn tractor |
| Brand | John Deere |
| Weight Lbs | 955 lbs |
| Engine Power Kw | 19 kw |
| Cutting Width Mm | 1219 mm |
| Weight Kg | 433 kg |
| Transport Length M | 1.9 m |
| Transport Length Inches | 75 in |
| Transport Width M | 1.2 m |
| Transport Width Inches | 46 in |
| Power Source | Petrol |
Higher than average John Deere X585 lawn tractor Specs
Lower than average John Deere X585 lawn tractor Specs
Weight Lbs
Lawn tractor weight refers to the weight of a lawn tractor, usually measured in pounds. This measurement helps determine the stability and maneuverability of the tractor on different terrains. A lighter tractor may be easier to navigate, but a heavier one could offer better traction and durability.
The John Deere X585 lawn tractor has extraordinary Weight lbs of 955 (lbs), which is 559 (lbs) more than the average Weight lbs of 396 (lbs). The John Deere X585 lawn tractor is ranked 12 out of 174 lawn tractors for Weight lbs and we have rated it 43% out of 100%, which we consider to be well below average.
Weight Lbs:
Engine Power Kw
Lawn tractor engine power refers to the measurement of energy output by the engine of a lawn tractor, specifically in kilowatts. A higher kW rating suggests greater power and enables the tractor to tackle demanding terrain and heavy-duty work effortlessly.
The John Deere X585 lawn tractor has a colossal Engine power kw of 19 (kw), which is 3 (kw) more than the average Engine power kw of 16 (kw). The John Deere X585 lawn tractor is ranked 3 out of 174 lawn tractors for Engine power kw and we have rated it 83% out of 100%, which we consider to be average.
Engine Power Kw:
Cutting Width Mm
The term "cutting width" refers to the measurement, usually in millimeters, of how wide a lawn tractor's cutting deck can trim the grass in one pass. It indicates the amount of area that can be mowed efficiently, helping you determine the time and effort required for mowing your lawn.
The John Deere X585 lawn tractor has awesome Cutting Width mm of 1219 (mm), which is 872 (mm) more than the average Cutting Width mm of 347 (mm). The John Deere X585 lawn tractor is ranked 20 out of 174 lawn tractors for Cutting Width mm and we have rated it 80% out of 100%, which we consider to be average.
Cutting Width Mm:
Transport Length Inches
Lawn tractor transport length inches refers to the measurement of a lawn tractor's length when it is being transported, usually in inches. It helps determine the space required for transportation and storage.
The John Deere X585 lawn tractor has really good Transport length inches of 75 (in), which is 29 (in) more than the average Transport length inches of 46 (in). The John Deere X585 lawn tractor is ranked 40 out of 174 lawn tractors for Transport length inches and we have rated it 55% out of 100%, which we consider to be well below average.
Transport Length Inches:
Transport Width M
The lawn tractor's transport width (m) refers to the measurement of how wide the tractor is when it is being transported. This is essential to know, as it determines whether the tractor can fit through narrow spaces or onto trailers.
The John Deere X585 lawn tractor has tremendous transport width m of 1.2 (m), which is 1.2 (m) more than the average transport width m of 0 (m). The John Deere X585 lawn tractor is ranked 17 out of 174 lawn tractors for transport width m and we have rated it 75% out of 100%, which we consider to be poor.
Transport Width M:
Transport Width Inches
The lawn tractor transport width, stated in inches, refers to the measurement of the width of the lawn tractor when it is being transported. This measurement is important for determining whether the lawn tractor can fit through narrow spaces or be easily loaded onto a trailer.
The John Deere X585 lawn tractor has stupendous transport width inches of 46 (in), which is 35 (in) more than the average transport width inches of 11 (in). The John Deere X585 lawn tractor is ranked 23 out of 174 lawn tractors for transport width inches and we have rated it 74% out of 100%, which we consider to be poor.